Arctic Biodiversity Congress 2018 Preliminary Program

Plenary program subject to change. Rooms have yet to be assigned. 

Six main themes guide the flow and organization of the Congress. These overarching themes will run concurrently throughout the Congress and will form the backbone for the Congress. These themes were identified in the Arctic Biodiversity Assessment recommendations for policy

     

AS9: Biodiversity in the high seas of the Central Arctic Ocean: Advancements in scientific understanding and future management

Date: Wednesday October 10, 2018

Location: Valtuustosali, City Hall

Time: 10:30-12:00

The high seas region of the Central Arctic Ocean (CAO) is a remote area characterized by significant extent of multi-year sea ice which has existed for millennia. The current warming trend and the resulting reduction of sea ice cover from the CAO have signaled an emerging need to improve our understanding of its understudied ecosystems and to explore management options to protect this area from future anthropogenic pressures. Recent international scientific and policy cooperation on the CAO have led to opportunities to improve our understanding of its ecosystems and biodiversity. In particular, negotiations on a legally-binding Agreement to Prevent Unregulated Fishing in the High Seas of the Central Arctic Ocean. In support of these negotiations, meetings of Scientific Experts on Fish Stocks in the CAO have taken place to review the state of the knowledge on fish and invertebrate species and to develop plans for fishery research using an ecosystem-based approach. In addition, a working group of the Arctic Council has been working with regional science bodies to complete an Integrated Ecosystem Assessment of the CAO. This session will address these topics and their relevance for integrated, ecosystem based management of the region.

Chairs: Maya Gold, Fisheries and Oceans Canada; 

Format: Series of presentations followed by discussion

Presentations:

  1. The CAO Fishing Agreement: Negotiations and next steps: Maya Gold, Fisheries and Oceans Canada pdf
  2. Scientific cooperation in the central Arctic Ocean: TBC 
  3. The Central Arctic Ocean Integrated Assessment: Informing Ecosystem-based Management: Hein Rune Skjoldal, Institute of Marine Research pdf
  4. Ecosystem-Based Management in the Central Arctic Ocean: Henry Huntington, Pew Charitable Trusts pdf
  5. Implications of the UN high seas negotiations on the CAO: David VanderZwaag, Dalhousie University

 


Abstracts:

Ecosystem-Based Management in the Central Arctic Ocean

Olga Romanenko, Pew Charitable Trusts; Henry Huntington, Ocean Conservancy

The 2017 Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean commits its signatories to an ecosystem-based approach to management. An important component of this effort is developing an international scientific research and monitoring program to support the policy objectives of the agreement. The central Arctic Ocean is remote and, for most of the year, ice-covered, making research there expensive and technologically challenging. No nation is likely to bear all the costs necessary to study the region, and few nations have enough ice-capable research vessels to do so even if they wanted to. Therefore, international cooperation will be necessary. All the signatories to the agreement have active Arctic Ocean research programs. A transparent mechanism for data sharing, research coordination, and assessing the status of fish stocks and ecosystem health for the central Arctic Ocean will do a great deal to foster continued international cooperation in policy as well as science. This presentation addresses the practical needs for international cooperation to carry out ecosystem-based management in the Arctic, as part of a precautionary international agreement, and as an example of what can be achieved through commitment to the principles and recommendations of the Arctic Biodiversity Assessment.

 

AS8: Arctic Invasive Alien Species Action Plan: National implementation and empowering decision making by mobilizing, sharing, and analyzing Arctic invasive alien species data

Date: Wednesday October 10, 2018

Location: Kero, Lappia Hall

Time: 15:15-17:15

Effective implementation of the CAFE-PAME Arctic Invasive Alien Species (ARIAS) Strategy and Action Plan is dependent on national implementation, international cooperation and the availability of high quality data. The session will include presentations on national implementation activities, explore how governments can work together to advance the ARIAS Strategy and Action Plan through international environmental frameworks and other relevant bodies, and highlight national- and regional-scale information systems and tools to share information and technologies to advance understanding and reporting of species occurrence, identification, and analysis.

Chair: Jamie K. Reaser, US National Invasive Species Council

Format: Series of presentations followed by discussion

Presentations:

  1. National Implementation: Finland: Johanna Niemivuo-Lahti, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Finland pdf
  2. National Implementation: United States: Aaron Martin, US Fish and Wildlife Service pdf
  3. Thematic Implementation: Community-based Monitoring (Priority Actions 2.3 & 3.2): Maya Gold, Fisheries and Oceans Canada pdf
  4. Thematic Implementation: Information Management and Decision Support Tools (Priority Actions 2.3, 2.4 & 3.2): Gerald (Stinger) Guala, US Geological Survey 
  5. Thematic Implementation: Risk Assessment (Priority Actions 2.1, 3.3 & 3.7): Kim Gustavson, Aarhus University pdf
  6. Advancing Technologies to Address Invasive Alien Species: Jamie K. Reaser, US National Invasive Species Council pdf
  7. Moderated group discussion: Jamie K. Reaser, US National Invasive Species Council 

 


Abstracts:

 

National Implementation: Finland

Johanna Niemivuo-Lahti, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Finland

Finland has launched a national project to begin the implementation of the ARIAS Strategy and Action Plan as well as the recommendations of the Arctic Biodiversity Assessment. Finland has started with the 2nd goal of the ARIAS Action Plan to improve the knowledge base for well-informed decision making: the project aims to identify and assess in the Arctic region of Finland a) which invasive alien species and pathways pose the greatest risk, b) which ecosystems, livelihoods, and cultural resources are most vulnerable to biological invasion, and c) what kind of patterns and trends of introduction and impacts of invasive alien species there are (Priority Action 2.1). With the analyzed results of this project Finland would like share with the other Arctic Biodiversity Congress partners some further ideas of how to inspire even more effective action and awareness rising across the Arctic region, some proposals of collaboration with the other Arctic partners, as well as some ideas of the further key actions needed in the Arctic region of Finland. With our presentation, we would like to encourage the others to undertake and develop some further actions to protect the Arctic region from the adverse impacts of invasive alien species.

 

National Implementation: United States

Aaron Martin, US Fish and Wildlife Service

Invasive species have significant ecological, economic, and socio-cultural impacts in the regions they are introduced. Conserving and restoring ecosystems and the industries and cultures that depend on the native species/ecosystems can be challenging and contentious due to project logistics and scope as well as differing views on what actions should occur and what invasive species to prioritize resources towards. However, implementing thorough preventative practices and a comprehensive early detection and rapid response program at various scales can minimize the complexity and cost of invasive species management. The U.S. is achieving the goals of the Arctic Councils Arctic Invasive Alien Species (ARIAS) Strategy and Action Plan as well as domestic invasive species strategies through extensive collaboration among state, federal and tribal agencies, as wells as numerous non-governmental organizations. This presentation will focus on the collective efforts to implement a comprehensive prevention and early detection – rapid response framework across Alaska and opportunities to expand on these to the circumpolar level. We will highlight our efforts to achieve the three priority actions of the ARIAS Plan through the development of a multi-stakeholder communication plan, conducting suitability and vector analyses, and preventing the introduction of new invasive species.

 

Thematic Implementation: Risk Assessment (Priority Actions 2.1, 3.3 & 3.7)

Kim Gustavson, Aarhus University; Susse Wegeberg, Aarhus University; Ole Gert Hansen, Greenland Institute of Natural Resources; Tom Christensen, Aarhus University

Based on review of literature and databases, potential invasive species for the waters around Greenland has been identified. Potential risk of the individual species are evaluated according to risk assessment methods outlined in the IMO Guidelines (MEPC.162, 56). The three assessment methods are Environmental matching risk assessment, Species’ biogeographical risk assessment and Species-specific risk assessment. Environmental matching risk assessment relies on comparing environmental conditions between locations, species’ biogeographical risk assessment compares the overlap of native and non-indigenous species to evaluate environmental similarity and to identify high risk invaders, while species-specific risk assessment evaluates the distribution and characteristics of identified target species. The three approaches could be used either individually or in any combination, recognizing that each approach has its limitations. Result of the risk assessment is presented and potential hazardous invasive species are listed.

 

Advancing Technologies to Address Invasive Alien Species

Jamie K. Reaser, U.S. National Invasive Species Council

The Arctic Invasive Alien Species (ARIAS) Strategy and Action Plan calls for the advancement of technologies to improve the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of prevention, eradication, and control efforts. This presentation will provide an introduction to emerging technologies for invasive alien species detection, identification, reporting, and management, as well as introduce a new online platform for fostering technological solutions to invasive alien species challenges. 

AS6: Understanding cumulative effects on Arctic biodiversity and landscapes

Date: Tuesday October 9, 2018

Location: Kero, Lappia Hall

Time: 17:00-18:30

This session consists of a facilitated panel discussion of different Arctic right-holders and stakeholders about cumulative effects on Actic biodiversity and livelihoods. The participants will discuss how visualization of spatial data, and the combination of scientific and traditional knowledge, could be used and improved to address different right-holders’/ stakeholders’ needs for information, planning and communication.

Chairs: Kathrine Johnsen, GRID-Arendal; Ole Anders Turi, Saami Council

Format: facilitated panel discussion

Panelists:

  1. Levi Westerveld, GRID-Arendal
  2. Starri Heiðmarsson, Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Rif Field Station, Iceland
  3. Mikhail Pogodaev, Northern Forum
  4. Maret Risten Sara, Gearretnjarga reindeer herding district

 


AS7: Arctic Ocean Acidification: Pan-Arctic processes and regional ecosystem impacts

Date: Wednesday October 10, 2018

Location: Kero, Lappia Hall

Time: 8:30-10:00

The Arctic Ocean and its surrounding seas are particularly susceptible to ocean acidification (OA) due to greater absorption of CO2 by cold high-latitude waters and delivery of CO2-rich water masses into the Arctic basin. Rapidly progressing acidification poses a significant threat to northern communities and commercial fisheries that depend on marine resources in the region. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme finalizes the second Arctic Ocean Acidification (AOA) Assessment in 2018 which provides a five-year update on both physical and biological impacts of OA as well as regionally focused case studies. The results from the AOA 2018 assessment will be published for the first time at the Arctic Biodiversity Congress. A scientific team of authors report here on the status and trends of Arctic OA as well as region specific processes that have emerged since the last AOA in 2013. The format of the session will be five 15 minutes presentations of the assessment results followed by discussions. A total of five case studies discuss region-specific impacts to marine resources and describe economic impacts to rapidly progressing OA. A new component of the 2018 AOA update includes a pan-Arctic economic assessment of acidification impacts to marine resources and northern economies.

Chairs: Emily Osborne, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Richard Bellerby, Norwegian Institute for Water Research; Claudia Gelfond, University of Alaska, Fairbanks

Format: Series of presentations followed by discussion

Presentations:

  1. Arctic ocean acidification: Scientific updates on chemical processes: Richard Bellerby, East China Normal University and Norwegian Institute for Water Research pdf
  2. Biological responses to Arctic ocean acidification: Peter Thor, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute pdf
  3. Climate change impacts on subsistence fisheries in the Western Canadian Arctic- A framework linking climate model projections to local communities: Nadja Steiner, Fisheries and Oceans Canada pdf
  4. Socioeconomic effects of ocean acidification in northern Norway: A kelp-urchin case study: Philip Wallhead, Norwegian Institute for Water Research pdf
  5. Socio-economic Impacts of Arctic ocean acidification: Henry Huntington, Huntington Consulting pdf

 


Abstracts:

 

Arctic ocean acidification: Scientific updates on chemical processes

Richard Bellerby, East China Normal University and Norwegian Institute for Water Research; Leif Anderson, University of Gothenburg; Emily Osborne, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Nadja Steiner, Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Melissa Chierici University of Gothenburg; Agneta Fransson, Norwegian Polar Institute; Kumiko Azetsu-Scott, Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Jessica Cross, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Jón Ólafsson, University of Iceland

We report on overarching concepts of recent advances in our understanding of ocean acidification from a chemical perspective building upon the last AMAP report on ocean acidification (AMAP, 2013). Inflows via the Atlantic and Pacific gateways continue to significantly control dynamics in regional marginal seas such as the Barrents and Chukchi Seas. Specifically in the east, high marine primary production is stimulated by the inflow of high nutrient water from the Pacific Ocean. In other areas, organic matter, both dissolved and particulate, is added to marginal seas via land by river runoff and coastal erosion, a feature that is especially relevant in the Laptev, East Siberian and Chukchi Seas. In the East Siberian and Chukchi Seas the high CO2 concentrations are most obvious in the bottom waters as the majority of the organic matter degradations near the ocean-sediment interface. These CO2- and nutrient-rich bottom water flows off the shelf into the deep Canada Basin where it is “trapped” for some time in the Beaufort Gyre centred around a depth of about 100 m. The horizontal extent of the Beaufort Gyre varies with time depending on the dominating atmospheric pressure field, which leads to that the magnitude of the outflow of the high in CO2 water fluctuates. Surface water of the Beaufort Gyre also contains low salinity water, originating from both sea ice melt and river runoff, both of which have increased with climate warming. Freshening of surface seawater that is in equilibrium with atmospheric CO2 result in a lower pH, if the total alkalinity decreases with salinity, thus also contributing to ocean acidification. Further, freshening also lowers the concentration of calcium ions and therefore further lowers the saturation state of calcium carbonate minerals. Due to the sea-ice cover with ice formation and melt in the Arctic Ocean in parts of the year, sea-ice processes such as CO2-rich brine rejection and calcium carbonate (CaCO3; ikaite) precipitation/dissolution affect the carbonate chemistry in underlying water. Results indicate that ikaite export from sea ice and its dissolution in the underlying seawater can potentially hamper the effect of oceanic acidification and decreased aragonite saturation state ΩA in fall and in winter in ice-covered areas, at the time when ΩA is smallest. This process has been suggested in several studies such as in Young Sound Greenland, in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, the Nansen Basin, and further confirmed by an investigation in an outdoor-pool experiment in Young Sound.

 

Biological responses to Arctic ocean acidification

Peter Thor, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute; Jelmert Anders, Institute of Marine Research; Felix C. Mark, Alfred Wegener Institute; Kai G Shulz; GEOMAR, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research; Bjoern Rost, Alfred Wegener Institute; Peter Thor, Norwegian Polar Institute

This presentation will provide an overview of the current state of understanding regarding potential responses to ocean acidification for Arctic species and ecosystems. While we emphasize studies within the Arctic region that have been published recently (i.e. in the last 5 years, since the first AMAP report), for some ecosystem components there remains limited literature and so we have supplemented this with key earlier studies and recent work from other regions. We focus on key taxonomic groups, with potential implications for ecosystem-wide and longer-term adaptive responses highlighted. We also identify how ocean acidification may be modified by human activities driving changes to other abiotic and biotic characteristics.

 

Climate change impacts on subsistence fisheries in the Western Canadian Arctic- A framework linking climate model projections to local communities

Nadja Steiner, Fisheries and Oceans Canada; William Cheung, University of British Columbia; Helen Drost,  University of British Columbia; Carie Hoover, Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Vicky Lam, University of British Columbia; Lisa Miller, Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Andrés Cisneros-Montemayor, University of British Columbia; Tessa Sou, Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Rashid Sumaila, University of British Columbia; Paul Suprenand, MOTE Marine Laboratory and Aquarium; Travis Tai, University of British Columbia; David L. VanderZwaag, Dalhousie University, Canada

A Western Arctic Bioregion Ocean Acidification case study reviews recent changes and projections of OA in the region and addresses potential impacts and other climate related stressors on the marine ecosystem. The case further evaluates the impacts of these changes on local marine species relevant for subsistence fisheries. The study is an interactive and iterative process using a combination of modelling and analysis tools as follows: 1. Analyze past observed trends. 2. Perform projection simulations with a regional Arctic climate model for 2006-2085, allowing trend estimates on 20-50 year timescales. 3. Feed trends and climate model projections into species distribution/habitat suitability and higher trophic level Ecosim/Ecopath models. 4. Assess physiological responses and thresholds in marine species via literature research and focused lab experiments and include results into the models above. 5. Assess socio-economic impacts via economic models, evaluation of current fishery-economic activities, and discussions with the communities/community representatives. 6. Review the law a governance context implications. This report represents the first iteration of this process, recognizing that refinements and uncertainty analyses are required for the individual components as well as the overall procedure. With respect to step 3, 4 and 5, the report includes a general summary of species as information is available, then highlights the key forage species Boreogadus Saida(Arctic cod).

 

Socioeconomic effects of ocean acidification in northern Norway: A kelp-urchin case study

Philip Wallhead, Norwegian Institute for Water Research; Wenting Chen, Norwegian Institute for Water Research; Laura Falkenberg, Norwegian Institute for Water Research; Magnus Norling, Norwegian Institute for Water Research; Richard Bellerby, Norwegian Institute for Water Research; Sam Dupont, University of Gothenburg; Camilla with Fagerlig, Norwegian Institute for Water Research; Kasper Hancke, Norwegian Institute for Water Research; Hartvig Christie, Norwegian Institute for Water Research

We developed a kelp-urchin dynamical model to investigate optimal urchin harvesting strategies for the emerging coastal fishery in northern Norway, and to assess the impacts of ocean acidification and climate change. Under projected changes for the next 30 years (1°C warming, 100 μatm pCO2 increase) urchin harvest biomass suffered a roughly tenfold decrease, while the optimal minimum test diameter of harvested individuals remained unchanged at around 40 mm in both present-day and future simulations. This study highlights the pressing need for investigations of organismal sensitivities at moderate levels of warming and acidification, and of other ecosystem effects including disease and higher predation. The model is potentially a useful tool for ecosystem management and harvest optimization in the context of ocean acidification and climate change.

 

Socio-economic Impacts of Arctic ocean acidification

Henry Huntington, Huntington Consulting

Commercial fisheries in Arctic and subarctic water account for a tenth of the world’s catch (ABA 2013). Subsistence fisheries provide extensive nutritional and cultural benefits to Arctic residents and are based on the deep knowledge and extensive experience of Indigenous peoples and others who live in the Arctic (ABA 2013). The biological impact portion of the AOA report concludes, “forecasted ocean acidification is likely to be sufficient to drive changes in Arctic organisms and ecosystems to a magnitude that will impact the associated human societies.”. This presentation provides an overview of each of the five regional case studies and expounds upon socio-economic impacts such as disruption harvests, effects on employment and income, cultural continuity and health, community demographics, and individual well-being. Results of these cases indicate that the multi-stressor combination of warming of Arctic waters and increasing acidity is expected to have far-reaching effects on Arctic fishes, shellfishes, and the communities and industries that harvest them. Effects are likely to be modest in the near future however there is considerable regional variability and high-levels of uncertainty based on limited scientific understanding. Despite short-term trends, impacts of climate change are projected to increase substantially in the decades to come. It is important to note that not all the effects are major and not all are negative, but it is unlikely that ecosystems and fish stocks will remain stable over the long term under multi-stressor conditions. Significant gaps in our current understanding of ocean acidification on regional scales and within complex Arctic ecosystems and food webs currently hinders bioeconomic modeling of impacts and highlights the need for future targeted research on this topic. We suggest that management actions today can take into account the potential for disruption from ocean acidification and climate change to best prepare for the future. In addition, forward looking economic planning and investment, including training of workers, can aim for greater diversity and adaptability to deal with uncertainty and imminent Arctic Ocean change.

AS5: Conflict between people and polar bears in the Arctic: how to address an increasing issue?

Date: Friday October 12, 2018

Location: Erottaja, ELY

Time: 10:30-12:00

A reduction in available and suitable sea ice habitat for polar bears, combined with greater human presence in some areas, is predicted to result in more interactions between people and polar bears in the Arctic. Such encounters can lead to people being injured or killed, property damage and polar bears killed in defence. Ensuring the safe coexistence of humans and polar bears in the face of change is an essential component of polar bear management. This session will discuss continuing and emerging challenges of co-existence between people and polar bears. Using case studies across the Arctic, it will discuss recent advances in information tracking, technological innovations and attractant management. We welcome to this session presentations that showcase challenges with or solutions to managing conflict between people and other Arctic species that will be useful for knowledge exchange.

Chair: Melanie Lancaster, World Wide Fund for Nature

Format: Series of presentations followed by discussion

Presentations:

  1. Human-polar bear conflict: recap from CAFF ABC 2014: Melanie Lancaster, WWF  pdf
  2. Communities living with polar bears: Gregor Gilbert, Makivik Corporation; Mark Basterfield, Nunavut Marine WIldlife Management Board pdf
  3. Arctic governments working together: pan-Arctic workplan for HPBC reduction: Sybille Klenzendorf, World Wildlife Fund and co-chair of Polar Bear Range States Conflict Working Group pdf
  4. The polar bear deterrence toolbox: innovations: Femke Hilderink, World Wide Fund for Nature pdf
  5. Industry perspective from the oil and gas sector on reducing human-polar bear conflict: Christina Pohl, BP Alaska pdf

 



LAVVU1: Nomadic herders lavvu dialogue

Join Arctic youth and Indigenous leaders in the lavvu as they discuss observations of change and solutions for sustainable use of Arctic resources. LEARN MORE

Chairs: Svein Mathiesen, International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry; Katherine Johnsen, GRID Arendal; Gunn-Britt Retter, Saami Council

Location: Outside Lappia Hall
Date: Thursday October 11, 2018
Time: 10:30-12:30

                     

Activity: Bird nesting boxes and insect hotels

Join staff from Metsähallitus, Metsähallitus Forestry Ltd and Science centre Pilke to construct bird boxes and insect hotels. Participants can take their boxes and hotels home with them, or they can donate them local schools, who will take them into the forests and monitor their use. LEARN MORE.

Bird nesting box. photo: Timo Tahvonen

Chairs: Timo Tahvonen with Science centre Pilke inspirers, Metsähallitus

Location: Outside Lappia Hall 
Date: Tuesday October 9-Thursday October 11, 2018
Time: 12:00-15:00, while supplies last


The form and content of the Congress program is under development, with guidance from the Program Advisory Committee, but is expected to include the above elements. In order to allow for some adjustments, including further input from the Program Advisory Committee, Congress organizers reserve the right to make changes to the preliminary program. Such changes will be posted on this Congress website.

   logo 2  
 
Nordic Council of Ministers Converted small  nefco logo2 web Small    Equinor PRIMARY logo RGB RED small  
       
        ELY LA02 Logo EN V1 CMYK small 
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel
Join our LinkedIn Group
Check us out on Google+
Follow Us on Instagam
Follow Us on Flickr